Bonaldi v. Allison-Smith Company LLC et al
Filing
60
ORDER RULING ON 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is ordered that defendant Allison-Smith Company LLC's 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied, and 47 Motion to Exclude is granted. It is ordered that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this court and this case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 02/22/2016. (egra, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
Edward Angelo Bonaldi,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Allison-Smith Company LLC and International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 776,
Defendants.
) C.A. #2:15-0344-PMD-MGB
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendant
Allison-Smith Company LLC’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied, and motion to
exclude the affidavit of Edward Bonaldi be granted.
The record includes the report and
recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Local Rule
73.02(B)(2)(e), D.S.C., and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate
judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have
been filed to the magistrate judge’s report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this
case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is ordered that
defendant Allison-Smith Company LLC’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be DENIED, and
the motion to exclude the affidavit of Edward Bonaldi be GRANTED.
ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order
of this Court, and the case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker for further
handling.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 22, 2016
Charleston, South Carolina
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?