Joyner v. Lowcountry Credit Inc et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting 7 Motion to Compel; granting 7 Motion to Stay; adopting 10 Report and Recommendation. It is hereby ordered, that defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Pending Conclusion of Arbitration be granted, and ordered, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 05/06/2015. (egra, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Raenelle Joyner, Plaintiff, vs. Lowcountry Credit, Inc.; TruAuto, Inc.; McElveen Buick-GMC, Inc.; McElveen Insurance and Financial Planning, LLC; and Economy Cars, LLC, Defendants. ) C.A. No. 2:15-411-PMD ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Pending Conclusion of Arbitration be granted. The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) D.S.C.. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s report. A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is hereby ORDERED, that defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings Pending Conclusion of Arbitration be GRANTED, and ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. May 6, 2015 Charleston, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?