Grant-Davis v. South Carolina Office of the Governor et al

Filing 63

ORDER denying 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 59 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 02/17/2017.(adeh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION King Grant-Davis, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) South Carolina Office of the Governor and ) South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation ) Department, ) ) Defendants. ) ) C.A. No.: 2:15-cv-2521-PMD-MGB ORDER This matter is before the Court upon United States Magistrate Mary Gordon Baker’s report and recommendation (“R & R”) (ECF No. 59) that the Court deny Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 52). Defendants concur. Having carefully reviewed the R & R, the Court finds no errors therein and thus adopts it. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). Defendants’ motion is therefore DENIED. Defendants ask the Court to order that they retain the right to make several specific challenges to Plaintiff’s claims. Magistrate Judge Baker’s recommendation to give the parties sixty more days to file dispositive motions, which the Court adopts, sufficiently addresses that request. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 17, 2017 Charleston, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?