White v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Filing 37

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to plaintiff's claim under the ADEA, and since plaintiff has agreed to dismiss her § 1981 cause of action as well as any Title VII claims she may have al leged based upon events that occurred prior to October 7, 2012, those claims are also dismissed. It is ordered that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 05/03/2016. (egra, ) Modified on 5/4/2016 to edit docket text (egra, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
Pearline White,
Plaintiff,
vs.
South Carolina Department of Health
and Environmental Control,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C.A. #2:15-2761-PMD-TER

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendant’s
motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted as to plaintiff’s claim under the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act (ADEA) . The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g) and 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(A) and (B).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's
report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,
the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed to
the magistrate judge’s report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this
case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is ordered that the
defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted as to plaintiff’s claim under the ADEA, and
since plaintiff has agreed to dismiss her § 1981 cause of action as well as any Title VII claims she may
have alleged based upon events that occurred prior to October 7, 2012, those claims are also dismissed.
ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order of
this Court.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

May 3, 2016
Charleston, South Carolina

2