Boren v. IFA Rotorion-North America LLC et al

Filing 54

ORDER RULING ON 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 49 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Management Analysis & Utilization Inc. It is ordered that defendant MAU's motion to dismiss IFA's counterclaims is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation, and MAU's motion to dismiss IFA's cross-claims is denied. It is ordered, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 12/27/2016. (egra, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
Molly J. Boren,
Plaintiff,
vs.
IFA Rotorion-N America LLC; and
Management Analysis & Utilization, Inc.,
a/k/a MAU Staffing and Recruiting,
Defendants.

) C.A. #2:16-0841-PMD-BM
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that
defendant Management Analysis & Utilization, Inc.’s (“MAU”) motion to dismiss IFA
Rotorion-N America LLC’s (“IFA”) counterclaims be granted in part and denied in part .
The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
made in accordance with Local Rule 73.02(B)(2)(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the
magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject,
or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately
summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate
judge, it is ordered that defendant MAU’s motion to dismiss IFA’s counterclaims is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the Report and Recommendation,
and MAU’s motion to dismiss IFA’s cross-claims is DENIED.
ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as
the order of this Court.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

December 27, 2016
Charleston, South Carolina

2