Coardes v. Express Employment Professionals et al
Filing
13
ORDER: It appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue his case, he is ordered to file legal memoranda in response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 6 , [10 ]) no later than March 21, 2017. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned will recommend this case be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 3/6/2017. (mcot, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Tavis Coardes,
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs.
)
)
Express Employment Professionals,
)
And Key Logistic Solutions, LLC
)
)
Defendants. )
C/A No. 2:16-3408-PMD-KDW
ORDER
Plaintiff, appearing through counsel, filed this Title VII employment action on October
16, 2016. ECF No. 1. Each Defendant has appeared through counsel, submitted responses to
court-propounded interrogatories, and filed motions to dismiss this case. Express Employment
Professionals Mot. Dism., ECF No. 6; Key Logistic Solutions LLC Mot Dism., ECF No. 10.
Plaintiff’s responses to these dispositive motions were due on February 14 and February 21,
2017, respectively. To date, however, Plaintiff has not filed a response to either Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss, nor has he requested an extension of time within which to respond.
Accordingly, it appears to the court that Plaintiff may wish to abandon this action. If Plaintiff
wishes to pursue his case, he is ordered to file legal memoranda in response to Defendants’
Motions to Dismiss no later than March 21, 2017. See Local Civ. R. 7.06 (D.S.C.). Plaintiff is
advised that if he fails to comply with this deadline, the undersigned will recommend this case be
dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir.
1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 6, 2017
Florence, South Carolina
Kaymani D. West
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?