Bey v. Ziegler et al
ORDER AND OPINION adopting 12 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice and without service of process. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/7/2017.(ssam, )
USDC ClERK. CHARLESTON.SC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA2011 MAR -8 AM
Demeian Pinckney Bey,
Alma White, et aI.,
Case No 2: 17-cv-76-RMG
ORDER AND OPINION
Plaintiff, Demeian Pinckney Bey, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in January 2017. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff, claiming to be part ofa
"Moorish National Republic," alleges that Defendants violated his due process rights. (ld.) This
matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R. & R.") of the Magistrate
Judge to summarily dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and without service of process.
(Dkt. No. 12.)
No objections to the R. & R. have been filed. While this Court will conduct a de novo review
of any portion of the R. & R. to which a specific objection is made, it appears Congress did not
intend for the district court to review the Magistrate's factual and legal conclusions absent
objection by any party. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). This Court's
review of the record indicates that the R. & R. accurately analyzes the facts of this case and the
applicable law. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Magistrate's R. & R. (Dkt. No. 12) as the
Order of this Court. Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No.1) is DISMISSED without prejudice and
without service of process.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Charleston, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?