US Bank National Association v. Micari

Filing 14

ORDER RULING ON 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is ordered that the plaintiff's motion to remand is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, Berkeley County, South Carolina, and pro se defendant's motion to proceed IFP is dismissed as moot. It is ordered, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 11/07/2017. (egra, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA U.S. Bank National Association, Plaintiff, vs. Lawrence V. Micari, Defendant. ) C.A. #2:17-2444-PMD ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that the case be remanded to the Court of Commons Pleas, Berkeley County, South Carolina. The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with Local Civ. Rule 73.02(B)(2)(e) (D.S.C.) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report. A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED and this case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, Berkeley County, South Carolina, and pro se defendant’s motion to proceed IFP is DISMISSED as moot. ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. November 7, 2017 Charleston, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?