US Bank National Association v. Micari

Filing 14

ORDER RULING ON 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is ordered that the plaintiff's motion to remand is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas, Berkeley County, South Carolina, and pro se defendant's motion to proceed IFP is dismissed as moot. It is ordered, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 11/07/2017. (egra, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

U.S. Bank National Association,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Lawrence V. Micari,
Defendant.

) C.A. #2:17-2444-PMD
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)

This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that the case be
remanded to the Court of Commons Pleas, Berkeley County, South Carolina. The record includes
the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with
Local Civ. Rule 73.02(B)(2)(e) (D.S.C.) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate
judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have
been filed to the magistrate judge's report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this
case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is ORDERED
that plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED and this case is remanded to the Court of Common
Pleas, Berkeley County, South Carolina, and pro se defendant’s motion to proceed IFP is
DISMISSED as moot.

ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order
of this Court.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 7, 2017
Charleston, South Carolina

2