County of Charleston, South Carolina v. AT&T Corp et al
ORDER AND OPINION denying as moot 17 Defendants' Motion for More Definite Statement. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/6/2018.(sshe, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
County of Charleston South Carolina,
AT&T Corp, et. al.,
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02534
ORDER AND OPINION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Joint Motion for
. · oreqj)efitift:e
Statement. (Dkt. No. 17.) On October 3, 2017, this Court entered an order to itay b�ng on
Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement until this Court ruled on Plaintiff's anticipated
motion to remand. The Court ordered Plaintiff to move to remand no later than October 20,
2017. (Dkt. No. 24.)
Plaintiff moved to remand on October 20, 2017. (Dkt. No. 32.) On March 1, 2018,
Plaintiff withdrew its motion to remand (Dkt. No. 58), conceding that there is now complete
diversity in this action due to (1) the full settlement of Plaintiff's claims against McClellanville
and (2) a stipulation by defendants Comcast Phone of South Carolina, Inc. and Comcast IP
Phone, LLC that Plaintiff may amend its Complaint to include Comcast IP Phone, LLC as a
Defendant and to remove Comcast Phone of South Carolina, Inc. (Dkt. No. 58 at 2).
The parties then filed a joint stipulation agreeing that Plaintiff County of Charleston shall
file an Amended Complaint on or before April 2, 2018 reflecting these changes and alleging
federal subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Dkt. No. 59.) As the parties have
filed a motion consenting to Plaintiffs filing an amended complaint, Defendants' motion for a
More Definite Statement (Dkt. No. 17) is denied as moot.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Richard Mark Gergel
United States District Court Judge
Charleston, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?