Wright v. Quicken Loans Inc et al
ORDER RULING ON 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 5 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Quicken Loans Inc. It is hereby ordered that defendant's motion to dismiss is granted, and this case is dismissed. It is ordered, that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court, and it is so ordered. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 01/09/2018. (egra, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Quicken Loans Inc. and Shariff Holdings,
) C.A. #2:17-3049-PMD
The above-captioned case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation
that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate
judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civ. Rule
73.02(B)(2)(g) (D.S.C.). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that
Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the
magistrate judge. Thomas v Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file
timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives
the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d
91 (4th Cir. 1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this
case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is hereby
ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is dismissed.
ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order
of this Court, and
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 9, 2018
Charleston, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?