White v. Barnes

Filing 12

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court has carefully reviewed the Report. For the reasons stated by the magistrate judge, the Report, ECF No. 6, is ACCEPTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 8/2/2022. (dgar)

2:20-cv-02358-TLW

Date Filed 08/02/22

Entry Number 12

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
Willie James White,

Case No. 2:20-cv-02358-TLW

PETITIONER
v.

Order

Warden of F.C.I. Bennettsville,
RESPONDENT

Petitioner Willie James White, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. The matter now comes before
the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) filed by the
magistrate judge to whom this case was assigned. ECF No. 6. In the Report, the
magistrate judge recommends that the petition be summarily dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. Petitioner did not file objections to the Report. This matter is now ripe
for decision.
The Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the
Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify,
in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636.
In the absence of objections to the Report, the Court is not required to give any
explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200
(4th Cir. 1983). In such a case, “a district court need not conduct a de novo review,
but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the
record in order to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident
1

2:20-cv-02358-TLW

Date Filed 08/02/22

Entry Number 12

Page 2 of 2

Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory
committee’s note).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report. For the reasons stated by the
magistrate judge, the Report, ECF No. 6, is ACCEPTED. This action is hereby
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Terry L. Wooten
Terry L. Wooten
Senior United States District Judge
August 2, 2022
Columbia, South Carolina

2