Nogales v. United States of America et al
Filing
17
JUDGMENT: Plaintiff, Carlos Nogales, shall take nothing of Defendants, United States of America, H.S.I., Paul Criswell, as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without issuance or service of process and designate this case as a "strike" for purposes of the three strikes rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (hcor, )
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Carlos Nogales
Plaintiff
v.
United States of America, H.S.I., Paul Criswell,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
2:20-cv-03669-JMC
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
recover from the defendant (name)
the amount of
’ the plaintiff (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
costs.
dollars ($ ),
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: Plaintiff, Carlos Nogales, shall take nothing of Defendants, United States of America, H.S.I., Paul Criswell, , as
to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without issuance or service of process and
designate this case as a "strike" for purposes of the three strikes rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge, presiding. The Court having adopted the
Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Mary Gordon Baker, United States Magistrate Judge.
Date: April 27, 2021
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/H.Cornwell
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?