South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District et al

Filing 78

ORDER and OPINION: The Court denies this motion (Dkt. No. 77)on the same grounds that it denied Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 76).AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/24/24.(ltap, ) Modified document type on 9/25/2024 (sshe, ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
South Carolina Coastal Conservation
League, et al.,
v.

Case No. 2:22-CV-2727-RMG

Plaintiffs,
ORDER AND OPINION

United States Army Corps of Engineers,
Charleston District, et al.,
Defendants,

Tract 1 Timber, LLC, et al.,
Defendant-Intervenors.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction pending Plaintiffs’
appeal of this Court’s Order dated September, 19, 2024 to the Fourth Circuit. (Dkt. No. 77).
Plaintiffs do not set out new bases for the injunctive relief they seek, but rather explain that “[a]n
injunction pending appeal is warranted for the reasons articulated in Plaintiffs’ motion for a
preliminary injunction and reply in support of its motion.” (Id. at 1). The Court denies this motion
on the same grounds that it denied Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and
preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 76).
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_s/Richard M. Gergel
Richard Mark Gergel
United States District Judge
September 24, 2024
Charleston, South Carolina
1