South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District et al

Filing 78

ORDER and OPINION: The Court denies this motion (Dkt. No. 77)on the same grounds that it denied Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 76).AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/24/24.(ltap, ) Modified document type on 9/25/2024 (sshe, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, et al., v. Case No. 2:22-CV-2727-RMG Plaintiffs, ORDER AND OPINION United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, et al., Defendants, Tract 1 Timber, LLC, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction pending Plaintiffs’ appeal of this Court’s Order dated September, 19, 2024 to the Fourth Circuit. (Dkt. No. 77). Plaintiffs do not set out new bases for the injunctive relief they seek, but rather explain that “[a]n injunction pending appeal is warranted for the reasons articulated in Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and reply in support of its motion.” (Id. at 1). The Court denies this motion on the same grounds that it denied Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (Dkt. No. 76). AND IT IS SO ORDERED. _s/Richard M. Gergel Richard Mark Gergel United States District Judge September 24, 2024 Charleston, South Carolina 1  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?