Brown v. Ozmint et al

Filing 51

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, denying plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction as moot and granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, dismissing this matter with prejudice, for 47 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on August 19, 2009. (kbos)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Jon E. Ozmint; Robert E. Ward; Ernest ) Rowe; David Crisp; George T. Hagan; ) Kathy Hudson; John R. Pate; Mrs. Hogess; ) and Doris P. Poole, official and individual ) capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Donald L. Brown, C/A NO. 3:08-3470-CMC-JRM OPINION and ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's pro se complaint, filed in this court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (B)(2)(d), DSC, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Joseph R. McCrorey for pre-trial proceedings and a Report and Recommendation ("Report"). On July 28, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied and Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and the serious consequences if he failed to do so. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and the time for doing so has expired. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report of the Magistrate Judge to which a specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by

the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The court reviews the Report only for clear error in the absence of an objection. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (stating that "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.") (citation omitted). After reviewing the record of this matter, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the court agrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the court adopts and incorporates the Report and Recommendation by reference in this Order. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is denied as moot, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Cameron McGowan Currie CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Columbia, South Carolina August 19, 2009
C:\Documents and Settings\Kgb07\Local Settings\Temp\notesE1EF34\08-3470 Brown v. Ozmint adopt rr gr sumjgm.wpd

2