Heaton v. Investors Title Insurance Company Inc et al

Filing 47

ORDER re 45 Rule 26(f) Report, denying without prejudice parties' request to amend the 37 Second Amended Scheduling Order. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 08/26/2010. (bshr, )

Download PDF
H e a t o n v. Investors Title Insurance Company Inc et al D o c . 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA C O L U M B IA DIVISION A n g e la D. Heaton, ) ) P l a in tif f , ) ) vs. ) ) In v e s to rs Title Insurance Company, Inc.; ) T ra n s Union, LLC; Pendergrass Law ) F irm , PLLC; Reed Elsevier, Inc.; ) L e x is N e x is Risk & Information ) M a n a g e m e n t Group, Inc.; and Seisint, ) I n c ., ) ) D e f e n d a n ts . ) ________________________________ ) C / A No.: 3:10-274-JFA ORDER T h is matter is before the Court on the parties' request to amend the current scheduling o rd e r. (ECF No. 45.) The parties have amended the scheduling order twice in the past six m o n th s and represented to the Court on the June 8, 2010 conference call that a 90-day e x te n sio n would be sufficient. Because the parties have put forth no new reason for an a d d itio n a l extension, the parties' request is hereby denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. August 26, 2010 C o lu m b ia , South Carolina J o s e p h F. Anderson, Jr. U n ite d States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?