Park v. SSC Service Solutions Corp

Filing 80

ORDER granting (79) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:10-cv-02949-JFA; granting (22) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:11-cv-03011-JFA; granting (18) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:11-cv-03108-JFA; granting (18) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:1 1-cv-03188-JFA, dismissing the actions with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 03/06/2012. Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-02949-JFA, 3:11-cv-03011-JFA, 3:11-cv-03108-JFA, 3:11-cv-03188-JFA. (bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Sarah Park, Plaintiff, vs. Southeast Service Corp., Defendant. Carmen Nazario, Plaintiff, vs. Southeast Service Corp., Defendant. Allison Epps, Plaintiff, vs. Southeast Service Corp., Defendant. Betty Smith, Plaintiff, vs. Southeast Service Corp., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 3:10-cv-02949-JFA ORDER OF DISMISSAL Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-03011-JFA Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-03108-JFA Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-03188-JFA -1- IT APPEARING that the above-entitled matters have been resolved by compromise and mutual consent by and between the plaintiffs, Sarah Park, Carmen Nazario, Allison Epps, and Betty Smith, and the defendant, Southeast Service Corporation, NOW, THEREFORE, upon Motion of Sowell Gray Stepp & Laffitte, L.L.C., attorneys for the defendant, Southeast Service Corporation, by and with the consent of the undersigned attorneys for the plaintiffs, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the Complaints in the above-entitled actions be dismissed, with prejudice, as to the defendant, Southeast Service Corporation. IT IS SO ORDERED. March 6, 2012 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?