Park v. SSC Service Solutions Corp
Filing
80
ORDER granting (79) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:10-cv-02949-JFA; granting (22) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:11-cv-03011-JFA; granting (18) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:11-cv-03108-JFA; granting (18) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:1 1-cv-03188-JFA, dismissing the actions with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 03/06/2012. Associated Cases: 3:10-cv-02949-JFA, 3:11-cv-03011-JFA, 3:11-cv-03108-JFA, 3:11-cv-03188-JFA. (bshr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Sarah Park,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Southeast Service Corp.,
Defendant.
Carmen Nazario,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Southeast Service Corp.,
Defendant.
Allison Epps,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Southeast Service Corp.,
Defendant.
Betty Smith,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Southeast Service Corp.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.: 3:10-cv-02949-JFA
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-03011-JFA
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-03108-JFA
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-03188-JFA
-1-
IT APPEARING that the above-entitled matters have been resolved by
compromise and mutual consent by and between the plaintiffs, Sarah Park, Carmen Nazario,
Allison Epps, and Betty Smith, and the defendant, Southeast Service Corporation,
NOW, THEREFORE, upon Motion of Sowell Gray Stepp & Laffitte, L.L.C.,
attorneys for the defendant, Southeast Service Corporation, by and with the consent of the
undersigned attorneys for the plaintiffs,
IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
that the Complaints in the above-entitled actions be dismissed, with prejudice, as to the
defendant, Southeast Service Corporation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
March 6, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?