Meadows v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 48

ORDER granting 43 Motion for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/25/2014.(cwil, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Tiffany Meadows, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner ) of the Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-00290-JMC ORDER AND OPINION This matter is before the court upon motion of Plaintiff, through her attorney, Paul T. McChesney, for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF No. 43). Plaintiff’s motion seeks reimbursement for Counsel’s representation in the captioned matter in the amount of $17,765.50, not to exceed 25% of the total of the past-due benefits awarded to Plaintiff. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 44) notifies the court that the Acting Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff’s request for fees in the amount stated herein. The court has reviewed Counsel’s fee petition that was submitted and finds Counsel’s request for fees reasonable. Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the stipulated amount of $17,760.50 from the claimant’s 25% of the total of the past-due benefits. Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) are paid from the claimant’s benefits, rather than from agency funds, based on a contract between the claimant and the claimant’s attorney. Plaintiff was also awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $7,000.00 (ECF No. 43-10.) Since Plaintiff has received the total amount of EAJA benefits, no offset is necessary. However, fees in this case will be awarded with the condition that any overlapping 1 fees be awarded to Plaintiff. Thus, Plaintiff’s attorney must refund the lesser of the two fees to Plaintiff. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002). IT IS SO ORDERED United States District Judge July 25, 2014 Greenville, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?