Christian v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 31

OPINION AND ORDER granting 26 MOTION for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b filed by Clifton Keith Christian Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/25/2012. (ydav, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Clifton Keith Christian, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner ) of the Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action. No. 3:11-cv-01422-JMC OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the court upon motion of the Plaintiff, through his attorney, Beatrice E. Whitten, for an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The record reflects that Plaintiff was the prevailing party in this action for social security disability benefits and supplemental security income, and his net worth is less than $2 million. On May 22, 2012, Counsel for the Plaintiff Beatrice E. Whitten (“Counsel”), filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs [Doc. 26] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The motion seeks reimbursement for Counsel’s representation in the captioned matter in the amount of $4,632.00 which amounts to less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the past-due benefits withheld by the Social Security Administration for attorney’s fees. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [Doc. 28] notifies the court that he does not oppose Plaintiff’s request for fees in the amount stated herein pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court has reviewed Counsel’s fee petition and the signed fee agreement that was submitted with the petition, and finds Counsel’s request for fees reasonable. Therefore, the Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 1 in the amount of $4,632.00. IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Judge Greenville, South Carolina July 25, 2012 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?