Brunson v. McHugh
Filing
24
ORDER Plaintiff is granted until March 14, 2012 to submit a Rule 56(d) affidavit identifying with specificity the alleged facts not currently supported by evidence and whether discovery is likely to reveal evidence supporting those facts. If Plaintiff fails to provide a sufficient Rule 56(d) affidavit, the court will rule on the pending summary judgment motion according to the briefing on the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 2/29/2012. (abuc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
Ronald Brunson,
Plaintiff,
vs.
John M. McHugh, Secretary of the
Army,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C/A No.: 3:11-2013-JFA-SVH
ORDER
This matter comes before the court pursuant to Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment [Entry #7]. Plaintiff filed a response to the summary judgment motion arguing,
inter alia, that he should be allowed to conduct discovery to defend against the motion.
[Entry #8]. In his reply, Defendant argues that Plaintiff has failed to support his argument
with an affidavit specifying the reasons he needs discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
56(d) and has not shown that further discovery is necessary. [Entry #15].
Rule 56(d) provides that the court may deny or continue a motion for summary
judgment “[s]hould it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that the
party cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify the party’s
opposition. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).
The affidavit should “particularly specif[y]
legitimate needs for further discovery.” Nguyen v. CNA Corp., 44 F.3d 234, 242 (4th Cir.
1995). Although the 56(d) affidavit need not contain evidentiary facts, it must explain
why facts precluding summary judgment cannot be presented. 10A Wright, Miller &
Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure, § 2740 at 530 (1983).
In light of the early procedural posture of this case, Plaintiff is granted until March
14, 2012 to submit a Rule 56(d) affidavit identifying with specificity the alleged facts not
currently supported by evidence and whether discovery is likely to reveal evidence
supporting those facts. If Plaintiff fails to provide a sufficient Rule 56(d) affidavit, the
court will rule on the pending summary judgment motion according to the briefing on the
docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 29, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?