Richard Stogsdill et al v. Sebelius et al

Filing 158

ORDER denying 155 MOTION for Certification to Appeal Claims of Richard Stogsdill to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 12/31/2014.(bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Richard Stogsdill, Nancy Stogsdill, Mother of Richard Stogsdill, Robert Levin, and Mary Self, Mother of Robert Levin, C/A No. 3:12-cv-0007-JFA Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER Anthony Keck and the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Richard Stogsdill’s (“Stogsdill”) Motion for Certification to Appeal Claims to Fourth Circuit. (ECF No. 155). In the motion, Stogsdill requests entry of an order allowing him to appeal this Court’s decision on his motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 131). After careful consideration of this matter and review of the motion, the Court is constrained to deny the motion. This case was instituted by Plaintiffs as a joint lawsuit. Despite the fact that this case is not designated as a class action, the causes of action alleged by the Plaintiffs are identical. As such, the Court believes any determination of specific issues as they relate to Plaintiff Robert Levin (“Levin”) may also have some bearing upon the claims made by Stogsdill. Furthermore, as Levin’ claims are slated to be heard by this Court during the February 2015 term of Court, a delay in appeal does not work a hardship on Stogsdill. Given these circumstances, the Court finds that any appeal of 1 Stogsdill’s claims is most appropriately brought in conjunction with any possible appeal of Levin’s claims. For the foregoing reasons, Stogsdill’s Motion for Certification to Appeal Claims to Fourth Circuit is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 3 , 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?