Quattlebaum v. Lexington County Sheriff et al
Filing
29
ORDER Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendants' motion to dismiss by May 29, 2012. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 5/15/2012. (abuc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Zucorry Quattlebaum, a/k/a Zucorry
Quattlebawn,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Lexington County Sheriff Metts;
Shannon Lovell, Deputy Sheriff,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C/A No.: 3:12-230-MBS-SVH
ORDER
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action alleging
violations of his constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a
motion to dismiss on April 9, 2012. [Entry #21]. As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the
court entered an order on April 10, 2012, pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309
(4th Cir. 1975), advising him of the importance of a motion to dismiss and of the need for
him to file an adequate response. [Entry #23]. Plaintiff was specifically advised that if he
failed to respond adequately, Defendants’ motion may be granted, thereby ending this
case.
Notwithstanding the specific warning and instructions set forth in the court’s
Roseboro order, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the
court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Based on the
foregoing, Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this
case and to file a response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss by May 29, 2012. Plaintiff is
further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal
with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir.
1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 15, 2012
Florence, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?