Robinson v. McHugh

Filing 65

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by John M McHugh, 62 Report and Recommendation, Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on June 23, 2014. (kbos)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Willie Earl Robinson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) John M. McHugh, Secretary, ) Department of the Army, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) C/A No.: 3:12-cv-1146-TLW ORDER On April 30, 2012, Willie Earl Robinson filed this employment discrimination case alleging claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701, et seq. (Doc. # 1). The matter now comes before this Court on for review of the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) filed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges, (Doc. #62), to whom this case was previously assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, (Doc. #55), and dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint in its entirety . (Doc. #62). Objections were due by March 31, 2014. Petitioner has filed no objections to the Report. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not 1 required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). This Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (Doc. # 62), is ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint, (Doc. #1), is DISMISSED in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Terry L. Wooten Chief United States District Judge June 23, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?