State of South Carolina, The v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp et al

Filing 56

ORDER remanding the action to the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, Fifth Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr on 01/21/2014. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court(bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION The State of South Carolina, C/A No. 3:12-cv-01776-JFA Plaintiff, vs. ORDER Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Innolux Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.; Hannstar Display Corporation; Samsung Electronics Company Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. Defendants. This case is one of four complaints stayed by the court pending the outcome of a petition for a writ of certiorari. Today, the United States Supreme Court denied that petition. AU Optronics Corp. v. South Carolina, 12-911, 2014 WL 210665 (U.S. Jan. 21, 2014). Accordingly, this court hereby lifts the stay. In light of today’s decision by the Supreme Court as well as its decision in a similar case, Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., 12-1036, 2014 WL 113485 (U.S. Jan. 14, 2014), this court finds that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and remands the case to state court. The Clerk of Court shall send a certified copy of this order of remand to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas, Richland County, Fifth Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 21, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?