Oxner v. Lexing Detension Center
ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 4/28/2014.(abuc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Francis A. Oxner,
C/A No. 3:14-cv-00007-TLW
Lexing[ton] [County] Deten[t]ion Center,
Plaintiff Francis A. Oxner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. #1.) The matter now comes before the Court for review of
the Report and Recommendation (Report) filed on March 6, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Paige J.
Gossett, to whom this case was assigned. (Doc. #10.) In the Report, the Magistrate Judge
recommends summarily dismissing this action without prejudice. Objections to the Report were
due March 24, 2014. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report.
The Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Report to
which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,
the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to
the Report, the Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.
See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report. For the reasons stated by the Magistrate
Judge, the Report is ACCEPTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Terry L. Wooten
Terry L. Wooten
Chief United States District Judge
April 28, 2014
Columbia, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?