Oxner v. Lexing Detension Center

Filing 13

ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 4/28/2014.(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Francis A. Oxner, C/A No. 3:14-cv-00007-TLW PLAINTIFF v. Order Lexing[ton] [County] Deten[t]ion Center, DEFENDANT Plaintiff Francis A. Oxner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. #1.) The matter now comes before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) filed on March 6, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett, to whom this case was assigned. (Doc. #10.) In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends summarily dismissing this action without prejudice. Objections to the Report were due March 24, 2014. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report. The Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report, the Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983). The Court has carefully reviewed the Report. For the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, the Report is ACCEPTED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Terry L. Wooten Terry L. Wooten Chief United States District Judge April 28, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?