Goodman v. Volt Information Services, Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER accepting 35 Report and Recommendation, granting 29 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution, dismissing the complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/8/2015. (cbru, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Valerie M. Goodman, Plaintiff, vs. Volt Information Services, Inc., and Schneider Electric USA, Inc., Defendants. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:14-458-MGL ORDER Plaintiff Valerie M. Goodman, (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to The Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq. (ECF No. 1). The matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) filed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D. West, to whom this case had previously been assigned. In the Report, (ECF No. 35), the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 29), be granted and that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and other cited authorities. Objections to the Report were due by October 5, 2015. Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report. The matter is now ripe for review by this Court. The Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and finds no error in the Report. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (ECF No. 35). Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 29) is thereby GRANTED and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) and other cited authorities. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____s/Mary G. Lewis____ United States District Judge October 8, 2015 Columbia, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?