Ball v. Derrick et al

Filing 101

JUDGMENT dismissing the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (gmil)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Brittany Ball, Plaintiff v. Paul Allen Derrick, individually and as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Richland; Leon Lott, Sheriff of Richland County; Richland County Sheriff’s Department; and Richland County, SC, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00770-TLW Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, Brittany Ball, shall take nothing of the defendants, Paul Allen Derrick, Leon Lott, Richland County Sheriff’s Department; and Richland County, SC, as to the complaint filed and the action as to these defendants is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Terry L. Wooten, Chief United States District Judge, presiding, having accepted the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which dismissed the action against defendants Paul Allen Derrick, Leon Lott, Richland County Sheriff’s Department; and Richland County, SC, with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Date: June 24, 2015 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/G. Mills Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?