Glenn v. Reeves

Filing 16

ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service. Motions granted: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Andres Leroy Glenn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 5/16/2014. (jpet, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Andres Leroy Glenn, Plaintiff, vs. Marques Reeves, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 3:14-1531-CMC-SVH ORDER This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(e) (D.S.C.), pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. On April 29, 2014, the court issued an order directing Plaintiff to provide documents necessary for initial review. [Entry #10]. Plaintiff has substantially complied with the order and this case is now in proper form. PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE: In response to this court’s April 29, 2014 order, Plaintiff submitted another Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Form AO240) and a Financial Certificate to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). A review of these documents reveals that Plaintiff does not have the funds to prepay the filing fee. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted [Entry #2], subject to the court’s right to require a payment if Plaintiff’s financial condition changes, and to tax fees and costs against Plaintiff at the conclusion of this case if the court finds the case to be without merit. See Flint v. Haynes, 651 F.2d 970, 972–74 (4th Cir. 1981). TO THE CLERK OF COURT: The Clerk of Court is directed not to issue the summons or forward this matter to the United States Marshal for service of process at this time IT IS SO ORDERED. May 16, 2014 Columbia, South Carolina Shiva V. Hodges United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?