United States of America v. 116850 in US Currency

Filing 113

ORDER superceding 110 Text Order, granting 109 MOTION for Protective Order, sealing 106 Emergency MOTION to Compel. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 08/18/2015. (bshr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
United States of America,

C/A No. 3:14-cv-01794-JFA

Plaintiff,

vs.

ORDER

$116,850.00 in United States Currency,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on Sergeant Jason Tassone and the Sumter County Sheriff’s
(together “Movants”) Motion for a Protective Order (ECF No. 109) under Rule 5.2, Fed. R. Civ. P.,
directing that ECF Nos. 106 and 106-1 be maintained under seal and that they not be publicly available.
This Court entered an order to produce the disciplinary record of Sergeant Jason Tassone (ECF
No. 102) on August 12, 2015. These documents were produced and entered into the record (ECF Nos.
106 and 106-1) on August 13, 2015. On August 14, 2015, this Court entered an order of dismissal in
the case (ECF No. 107). That same day, counsel for Movants filed a motion for a protective order to
seal the disciplinary record (ECF No. 109). On August 17, 2015, in light of the order of dismissal, this
Court entered a text order finding as moot Movant’s Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 110).
However, it has brought to the Court’s attention that, since the disciplinary record was produced and
entered into the record, Movant’s motion is not moot. Rather, it demands a ruling.

1

Thus, taking into account the factors stated in Ashcroft v. Conoco, Inc., 218 F.3d 288 (4th Cir.
2000) and In re Knight Publishing Co., 743 F.2d 231 (4th Cir. 1984), which must be considered for a
request such as this, the Court finds that sealing the disciplinary record is appropriate. The availability
of this record and its contents to the public is unnecessary and potentially prejudicial. Sergeant Tassone
is a non-party witness to a case which has now been dismissed. Further, the Court finds that there is
not any other less drastic alternative that would maintain the integrity of the confidential information
Movant seeks to protect. Finally, all other parties have consented to Movant’s motion.
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 109) is
GRANTED, Sergeant Tassone’s disciplinary record (ECF Nos. 106 and 106-1) is ordered to be
SEALED, and the Court’s text order (ECF No. 110) is SUPERCEDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

August 18, 2015
Columbia, South Carolina

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.
United States District Judge

2