Davis v. Bantz et al
Filing
12
JUDGMENT dismissing the complaint without prejudice and without issuance of service. (gmil)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Keith A. Davis,
Plaintiff
Civil Action No.
v.
Russel Bantz; Donald Hicks; Jennifer H.
Mckellar; Cpl. Hayhurst; A. Derrick; Jason
Williams; Lt. Robinson; Cameron Littlejohn, Jr.;
Sheriff Leon Lott; Richland County Sheriff
Department; Richland County Solicitors Office;
and J.D. Rowell,
3:14-cv-03732-JMC
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
dollars ($
of
recover from the defendant (name)
), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate
%, along with costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Keith A. Davis, shall take nothing of the defendants; Russel Bantz, Donald Hicks,
Jennifer H. Mckellar, Cpl. Hayhurst, A. Derrick, Jason Williams, Lt. Robinson, Cameron Littlejohn, Jr.,
Sheriff Leon Lott, Richland County Sheriff Department, Richland County Solicitors Office, and J.D. Rowell,
from the complaint filed and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge, presiding. The Court having
accepted the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States
Magistrate Judge, dismisses the complaint without prejudice.
Date: November 4, 2014
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/G. Mills
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?