Paschal v. Lott et al

Filing 26

ORDER extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Failure to file an amended complaint will result in dismissal of the complaint against Defendants Stan Smith and Howard Hughes. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 7/22/2015. (gmil)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Kay F. Paschal, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Leon Lott, in his individual and official ) capacity; Stan Smith, in his individual and ) official capacity; Howard Hughes, in his ) individual and official capacity; Heidi ) Scott, in her individual and official ) capacity, also known as Heidi Jackson; and ) Richland County South Carolina, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) C/A No.: 3:14-cv-04737-TLW On June 5, 2015, this Court entered an Order stating that “the Court finds that there are grounds to grant the motion to dismiss” filed by Defendants Stan Smith and Howard Hughes. (ECF No. 20). That Order further provided that “the Plaintiff may file a proposed amended complaint… within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order.” (Id.). The Plaintiff failed to file any amendment to her complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint within twenty (20) days from the entry of this order will result in dismissal of the complaint against Defendants Stan Smith and Howard Hughes. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 22, 2015 Columbia, South Carolina s/Terry L. Wooten Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?