United States of America v. Montgomery et al
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 MOTION for Service by Publication filed by United States of America. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/23/2015. (mwal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Alma A. Montgomery, Tracy
Montgomery, South Carolina
Department of Revenue, and the County
of Sumter,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C/A No.: 3:15-1297-MBS-SVH
ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the motion of the United States of America
(“Plaintiff”) to serve defendant Tracy Montgomery (“Montgomery”) by publication,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and S.C. Code 15-9-710. [ECF No. 17]. In support of its
motion, Plaintiff provided two affidavits of Diane Giddings of ABC Legal, process server
for Plaintiff. [ECF Nos. 17-1, 17-2]. In the affidavits, Ms. Giddings states that service
was attempted on Montgomery on March 31, 2015 at 545 Pudding Swamp Road,
Lynchburg, SC 29080 and on April 1, 2015 at 493 Wilson Hall Road, Sumter, SC. Ms.
Giddings stated that she spoke to Montgomery’s mother at his last known address of 493
Wilson Hall Road, who indicated that she did not have contact information for
Montgomery. Plaintiff argues that after a diligent search Montgomery cannot be found.
No party has objected to Plaintiff’s motion for service by publication. The
undersigned has reviewed the affidavits of non-service and finds that Plaintiff diligently
attempted to serve Montgomery. Therefore, the undersigned orders Plaintiff effect service
of process on defendant Tracy Montgomery by publishing the summons once a week for
six consecutive weeks in a publication of general circulation in the County of Sumter,
where Montgomery was last known to have resided and where he is most likely to
receive notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 23, 2015
Columbia, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?