Tice v. Adger et al

Filing 38

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 33 motion for the appointment of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/8/2016. (bgoo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Joseph Charles Tice, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Jerry B. Adger, Head Probation Officer; Lisa ) Baker, Probation Officer, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) C/A No. 3:15-4781-JFA-PJG ORDER Plaintiff Joseph Charles Tice, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a violation of his constitutional rights. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 33.) There is no right to appointed counsel in § 1983 cases. Hardwick v. Ault, 517 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1975). The court may use its discretion to request counsel to represent an indigent in a civil action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296 (1989). However, such discretion “should be allowed only in exceptional cases.” Cook v. Bounds, 518 F.2d 779, 780 (4th Cir. 1975). Whether exceptional circumstances are present depends on the type and complexity of the case, and the pro se litigant’s ability to prosecute it. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984), abrogated on other grounds by Mallard, 490 U.S. 296. Tice summarily argues that an attorney should be appointment due to his mental health issues. Upon review of the file, Tice’s filings thus far demonstrate a capacity to present his claims. Further, Tice has presented no evidence supporting a finding that any mental health issues would Page 1 of 2 interfere with his ability to prosecute his claims. Accordingly, Tice has shown no exceptional or unusual circumstances presented at this time which would justify the appointment of counsel or that he would be denied due process if an attorney were not appointed. Id. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion requesting counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ Paige J. Gossett UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE June 8, 2016 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?