Career Counseling, Inc. v. Amsterdam Printing & Litho, Inc. et al
Filing
140
CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting 139 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/25/2018.(asni, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
CAREER COUNSELING, INC. d/b/a/
SNELLING STAFFING SERVICES, a
South Carolina corporation, individually and
On behalf of all other similarly situated,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
AMSTERDAM PRINTING & LITHO, INC.,
)
TAYLOR CORPORATION and JOHN
)
DOES 1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________________ )
Case No. 3:15-cv-05061-JMC
CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
Whereas, the parties to this Consent Confidentiality Order (“Parties” or, individually, a
“Party”), have stipulated that certain discovery material is and should be treated as confidential,
and have agreed to the terms of this order; accordingly, it is this 25th day of September, 2018,
ORDERED:
1.
Scope. All documents, information, communications, and data produced in the
course of discovery, all responses to discovery requests, and all deposition testimony and
deposition exhibits, and any other materials which may be subject to discovery (collectively,
“Documents”) shall be subject to this Order concerning confidential information as set forth
below.
2.
Documents Which May be Designated Confidential. Any person or entity that
produces documents in connection with this action may designate Documents as
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY but only after review of
1
the documents by an attorney who has, in good faith, determined that the Documents contain
information protected from disclosure in accordance with the definitions and procedures below:
a.
The “CONFIDENTIAL” designation means that the document contains
information protected from disclosure by statute, sensitive personal information, sensitive
business information, proprietary business information, trade secrets, or confidential
research and development or other commercial information, or other information required
by law or agreement to be kept confidential.
b.
The “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” designation
means that the document contains information or data disclosing either: (1) Nonparties’
medical information protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(“Confidential Health Information”); (2) documents related to bank accounts belonging to
Nonparties (including but not limited to account statements, account opening documents,
correspondence about the nonparty account, and financial information provided by
nonparties for the purpose of establishing an account) (“Nonparty Financial
Information”).
3.
Form and Timing of Designation.
a.
Documents Produced in Image Format. Confidential Documents
produced in image format shall be so designated by placing or affixing the words
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” on each page
as to which confidentiality is claimed, and in a manner which will not interfere with the
legibility of the Document and which will permit complete removal of the
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY designation.
Documents produced in image format shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL or
2
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY prior to, or contemporaneously with,
the production or disclosure of the documents. Inadvertent or unintentional production of
documents produced in image format without prior designation as confidential shall not
be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate documents as
confidential as otherwise allowed by this Order. Given the volume and sensitivity of the
documents to be produced in this case, the parties may mark as “CONFIDENTIAL” all
documents that they produce, and documents so designated will be subject to this
Confidentiality Order. Notwithstanding section 10 below, the parties will meet and confer
in good faith to resolve challenges to the designation of documents so designated.
b.
Confidential Documents Produced in Native Format. Confidential
Documents produced in native format shall include a TIFF slip sheet with the Bates
number, stating that the document is being produced in native format and whether it has
been designated as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY.
c.
Redaction of account numbers and social security number. Any person
or entity may redact all but the last four digits of any bank or financial account number or
any social security number before production, regardless of whether the document
containing the number is designated as Confidential.
4.
Depositions. Portions of depositions shall be deemed CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY if designated as such when the deposition is
taken or within fourteen (14) business days after receipt of the transcript. Such designation shall
be specific as to the portions to be protected. Until the expiration of the 14-business day period,
the entire deposition will be treated as confidential.
3
5.
Protection of “CONFIDENTIAL” Material.
a.
General Protections. Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL under this
Order shall not be used or disclosed by the Parties or counsel for the Parties or any other
persons identified below (¶ 5.b.) for any purposes whatsoever other than preparing for
and conducting the litigation in which the Documents were disclosed (including any
appeal of that litigation).
b.
Limited Third Party Disclosures for Confidential Information. The
Parties and counsel for the Parties shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any
Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Order to any other
person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(9) below, and then, except as to
persons identified in subparagraphs (1) and (7) below, only after the person to whom
disclosure is to be made has executed an acknowledgment (in the form set forth at
Attachment A hereto) (“Acknowledgement”), that he or she has read and understands the
terms of this Order and is bound by it. Persons identified in subparagraphs (1) and (7)
below may receive disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL material without signing an
Acknowledgement. Subject to these requirements, the following categories of persons
may be allowed to review Documents which have been designated CONFIDENTIAL
pursuant to this Order:
(1)
In-house and outside counsel for the Parties, and paralegals,
secretaries, and law department employees who directly assist such attorneys with
the provision of legal services and who have responsibility for the preparation and
trial of the lawsuit;
4
(2)
employees and former employees of a Party to this Order where
the employee or former employee is engaged in assisting that Party’s attorneys in
the conduct of the litigation in which the information is disclosed and needs to
know about the subject matter of the Documents to perform that assistance;
(3)
court reporters engaged for depositions and those persons, if any,
specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making photocopies of documents;
(4)
consultants, investigators, or experts (hereinafter referred to
collectively as “Experts”) employed by the Parties or counsel for the Parties to
assist in the preparation and trial of the lawsuit;
(5)
witnesses or deponents and their counsel for purposes of preparing
for depositions or testimony;
(6)
the Court (and any appellate court), persons employed by the
Court, and court reporters transcribing the testimony or argument at a hearing or
trial in this action or any appeal therefrom;
(7)
auditors or insurers of any Party, or any state or federal regulator
or law enforcement agency (“Regulator or Agency”);
(8)
outside providers of document and ESI processing, hosting,
review, production, imaging, and coding services, to the extent reasonably
necessary to prepare for this litigation and trial, including e-Discovery consultants
and trial consultants; and
(9)
other persons only upon consent of the producing party or upon
order of the court and on such conditions as are agreed to or ordered.
6.
Protection of “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Material.
5
a.
General Protections. The Court recognizes that the production of
Nonparty Financial Information, including information related to nonparties that are
competitors of the Parties, may be requested. In accordance with section 2(b), documents
containing Nonparty Financial Information, which are produced, if any, shall be
designated CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. To the extent any state or
federal law, private party contract, or other legal authority (altogether, “Governing
Authority”) permits disclosure of such Nonparty Financial Information pursuant to an
order of a Court, this Order shall constitute compliance with such requirement, provided
such documents are designated CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. To
the extent any Governing Authority requires a producing party to obtain a court-ordered
subpoena or to give notice or obtain consent, in any form or manner, from any person or
entity before disclosure, the Court finds that, in view of the protections in this Order
provided for the information disclosed, the volume of documents to be produced and the
ongoing oversight of this Court, there is good cause to excuse such requirement, and the
Court hereby orders that the producing party is exempted from obtaining a court-ordered
subpoena or having to notify or obtain consent from any person or entity prior to the
disclosure provided that such documents are designated CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEY
EYES’ ONLY. To the extent that any Governing Authority requires that a person or
entity be notified prior to disclosure except where such notice is prohibited by court
order, the Court hereby orders, in view of the protections in this Order provided for the
information disclosed, the volume of documents to be produced and the ongoing
oversight of this Court, that producing parties are explicitly prohibited from providing
such notice in this litigation with respect to those documents designated
6
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’
EYES
ONLY.
Documents
designated
CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under this Order shall not be used or
disclosed by the Parties or counsel for the Parties or any other persons identified below (¶
6.b.) for any purposes whatsoever, and with respect to the persons identified below, only
to the extent necessary for preparing for and conducting the litigation in which the
Documents were disclosed (including any appeal of that litigation).
b.
Limited Third Party Disclosures for Confidential-Attorneys Eyes
Only Information. The Parties and counsel for the Parties shall not disclose or permit
the disclosure of any Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY under the terms of this Order to any other person or entity except as set forth in
subparagraphs (1)-(8) below, and then, except as to persons identified in subparagraphs
(1) and (6) below, only after the person to whom disclosure is to be made has executed an
Acknowledgment (in the form set forth at Attachment A hereto), that he or she has read
and understands the terms of this Order and is bound by it. Persons identified in
subparagraphs (1) and (6) below may receive disclosure of CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY material without signing an Acknowledgement. Subject to
these requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review
Documents which have been designated CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY pursuant to this Order:
(1)
in-house and outside counsel for the Parties, and paralegals,
secretaries, and law department employees who directly assist such attorneys with
the provision of legal services, and who have responsibility for the preparation
and trial of the lawsuit;
7
(2)
court reporters engaged for depositions and those persons, if any,
specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making photocopies of documents;
(3)
“Experts” employed by the Parties or counsel for the Parties to
assist in the preparation and trial of the lawsuit;
(4)
witnesses or deponents in this action who, on the face of the
material, appear to have authored or received the material, and their counsel for
purposes of preparing for depositions or testimony;
(5)
the Court (and any appellate court), persons employed by the
Court, and court reporters transcribing the testimony or argument at a hearing or
trial in this action or any appeal therefrom;
(6)
auditors or insurers of any Party, or any Regulator or Agency;
(7)
outside providers of document and ESI processing, hosting,
review, production, imaging, and coding services, to the extent reasonably
necessary to prepare for this litigation and trial, including e-Discovery consultants
and trial consultants; and
(8)
other persons only upon consent of the producing party or upon
order of the court and on such conditions as are agreed to or ordered.
c.
No Party may withhold information from discovery on the ground that it
requires protection greater than that afforded by this Order unless the Party moves for an
Order providing such special protection. Nothing contained herein shall be considered a
determination that any particular document or category of documents is relevant or
should be produced in this litigation.
8
7.
Competitors. Subject to paragraphs 5(b)(4) and 6(b)(3) above, no disclosure of
Confidential Information shall be made to any Competitor of the producing party. Any expert
witnesses that have been retained by a party on a consulting or testifying basis who are or work
for Competitors shall execute the attached form and agreement concerning their acceptance of
the terms and conditions of this Order, and such document shall be provided to the producing
party upon the disclosure of such expert witnesses, to the extent such expert witnesses are
disclosed. To the extent such witnesses are not disclosed, the producing party shall be provided
with copies of such documents following the completion of this litigation.
8.
prevent
Control of Documents. Counsel for the Parties shall take reasonable efforts to
unauthorized
disclosure
of
Documents
designated
as
CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the terms of this order. Counsel
shall maintain a record of those persons, including employees of counsel, who have reviewed or
been given access to the Documents along with the originals of the forms signed by those
persons acknowledging their obligations under this Order. If a Party receives a court order or
valid and effective subpoena, interrogatory or similar legal process from a non-governmental or
non-regulatory body that requires disclosure of any documents that have been designated
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, before making any
disclosure, that Party must promptly notify the other Party in writing of the order or other legal
process and provide at least fourteen (14) days for the other Party to object before producing the
material or as much time as is reasonable if the time for production is less than 14 days. Nothing
herein shall preclude any Party from disclosing any document, regardless of designation, to any
auditor or insurer of the Party or to any Regulator or Agency. Moreover, nothing herein shall be
construed as requiring any Party to notify the producing Party of disclosure to any auditor,
9
insurer, Regulator or Agency, provided that the disclosure is consistent with proper disclosure
under the Right to Financial Privacy (“RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 3401 et seq., and any other
applicable state or federal privacy law if such disclosure were made directly by a financial
institution.
9.
Copies. All copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions (hereinafter
referred to collectively as “Copies”), of Documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under this Order or any portion of such a
Document, shall be immediately affixed with the designation “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if the words do not already appear on the
Copy. All such Copies shall be afforded the full protection of this Order.
10.
Filing of Confidential Materials. In the event a Party seeks to file any material
that is subject to protection under this Order with the court, that Party shall take appropriate
action to insure that the Documents receive proper protection from public disclosure including:
(1) filing a redacted Document with the consent of the party who designated the Document as
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or who produced the
Document in native format; (2) where appropriate (e.g. in relation to discovery and evidentiary
motions), submitting the Documents solely for in camera review; or (3) where the preceding
measures are not adequate, seeking permission to file the Document under seal pursuant to the
procedural steps set forth in Local Civil Rule 5.03, DSC, or such other rule or procedure as may
apply in the relevant jurisdiction. Absent extraordinary circumstances making prior consultation
impractical or inappropriate, the Party seeking to submit the Document to the court shall first
consult with counsel for the Party who designated the Document as CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or who produced the Document in native
10
format to determine if some measure less restrictive than filing the Document under seal may
serve to provide adequate protection. This duty exists irrespective of the duty to consult on the
underlying motion. If a Party who produced a Document in native format believes that the
document
should
continue
to
be
treated
as
CONFIDENTIAL
or
CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, then that Party shall make a certification of
confidentiality at that time. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a prior directive to the
Clerk of Court to allow any Document be filed under seal. The Parties understand that
Documents may be filed under seal only with the permission of the court after proper motion
pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.03.
11.
Challenges
to
Designation.
Any
CONFIDENTIAL
or
CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY designation is subject to challenge. The
following procedures shall apply to any such challenge.
a.
The burden of proving the necessity of a CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY designation remains with the Party
asserting confidentiality.
b.
A Party who contends that Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY is inappropriate shall give written
notice to the Party who affixed the designation of the specific basis for the challenge. The
Party who so designated the Documents or produced the Documents in native format
shall have fifteen (15) days from service of the written notice to determine if the dispute
can be resolved without judicial intervention and, if not, to move for an Order confirming
the CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY designation.
11
c.
Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of Documents as
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, all material
previously designated CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY shall continue to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY subject to the full protections of this Order until one of the
following occurs:
(1)
the Party who claims that the Documents are CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY withdraws such designation in
writing;
(2)
the Party who produced the Document in native format
acknowledges in writing that the document should not be treated as
CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY;
(3)
the Party who claims that the Documents are CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY fails to move timely for an
Order designating the Documents as confidential as set forth in paragraph 11.b.
above; or
(4)
the court rules that the Documents should no longer be designated
as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.
d.
Challenges to the CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY designation of Documents may be made at any time and are not waived by
the failure to raise the challenge at the time of initial disclosure or designation.
12.
Treatment on Conclusion of Litigation.
12
a.
Order Remains in Effect. All provisions of this Order restricting the use
of Documents designated or presumed CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIALATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of the
litigation unless otherwise agreed or ordered.
b.
Return of CONFIDENTIAL Documents. Within thirty (30) days after
the conclusion of the litigation, including conclusion of any appeal, all Documents treated
as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under this
Order, including copies as defined above (¶8) shall be returned to the producing Party
unless: (1) the Document has been entered as evidence or filed (unless introduced or filed
under seal); (2) the Parties stipulate to destruction in lieu of return; or (3) as to
Documents containing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the
receiving Party, that party elects destruction. Notwithstanding the above requirements to
return or destroy Documents, counsel may retain attorney work product including an
index which refers or relates to information designated CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY so long as that work product does not
duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text of CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Documents. This work product
continues to be CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
under the terms of this Order. An attorney may use his or her work product in a
subsequent litigation provided that its use does not disclose the CONFIDENTIAL or
CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Documents.
13.
Production of Privileged or Otherwise Protected Documents or Materials.
13
a.
The inadvertent or unintentional production of privileged or otherwise
protected Documents or materials shall not be deemed a waiver or impairment of any
claim of privilege or protection, including, but not limited to, the attorney-client
privilege, the protection afforded to work product materials, the confidentiality protection
of this Order, or the subject matter thereof. Upon receiving notice from the producing
Party that privileged or otherwise protected Documents or materials have been
inadvertently or unintentionally produced, the receiving Party shall promptly return all
copies of the designated documents or materials to the producing Party or, at the election
of the Producing party, shall be destroyed. The return or destruction shall not be deemed
an admission or concession regarding any claimed privilege or protection.
b.
The production of privileged or work-product protected Documents or
information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or
protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This
provision shall be interpreted consistent with the Federal Rule of Evidence 502.
14.
Order Subject to Modification. This Order shall be subject to modification on
motion of any Party or any other person who may show an adequate interest in the matter to
intervene for purposes of addressing the scope and terms of this Order. The Order shall not,
however, be modified until the Parties shall have been given notice and an opportunity to be
heard on the proposed modification.
15.
No Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the representations
and agreements of the Parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery. Nothing herein shall
be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any specific Document or item of
information designated as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
14
by counsel is subject to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or
otherwise until such time as a document-specific ruling shall have been made.
16.
Persons Bound. This Order shall take effect when entered and shall be binding
upon: (1) counsel who signed below and their respective law firms; and (2) their respective
clients. If additional parties join or are joined in this action, the newly joined parties shall not
have access to Documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY until their counsel have executed Attached A and agreed to be bound to the terms
of this Protective Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/J. Michelle Childs
J. Michelle Childs
United States District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
CAREER COUNSELING, INC. d/b/a/
SNELLING STAFFING SERVICES, a
South Carolina corporation, individually and
On behalf of all other similarly situated,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
AMSTERDAM PRINTING & LITHO, INC.,
)
TAYLOR CORPORATION and JOHN
)
DOES 1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________________ )
Case No. 3:15-cv-05061-JMC
ATTACHMENT A: ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING AND
AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he or she has read the Confidentiality Order
dated [confidentiality order date], in the above captioned action, understands the terms thereof,
and agrees to be bound by such terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United
States District Court for the District of South Carolina in matters relating to the Confidentiality
Order and understands that the terms of said Order obligate him/her to use discovery materials
designated CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY solely for the
purposes of the above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such confidential information to
any other person, firm or concern. To the extent the undersigned is employed by a Competitor, as
defined in paragraph 7 of the Confidentiality Order, the undersigned further acknowledges that
disclosure to his or her employer of any such confidential information constitutes a violation of
the Confidentiality Order. Similarly, to the extent the undersigned is employed by a Competitor,
16
as defined in paragraph 7 of the Confidentiality Order, the undersigned further acknowledges and
confirms that his or her employer has sufficient practices and controls in place to ensure that
information provided to the undersigned will not be transferred, communicated, or otherwise
disseminated to other individuals employed by the undersigned’s employer or otherwise used by
the undersigned’s employer for any purpose whatsoever, including but not limited to use by the
undersigned for any reason in any manner (other than for use in this litigation) in the course of
his or her position at his or her employer.
The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Stipulated Confidentiality Order may
result in penalties for contempt of court.
s/ W. Allen Nickles III
NICKLES LAW FIRM, LLC
W. Allen Nickles III, Fed. ID No. 2541
1122 Lady Street, Suite 610
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Telephone: (803) 779-8080
Email: wanickles@nickleslaw.com
/s/ John G. Felder, Jr.
MCGOWAN HOOD FELDER
John G. Felder, Jr.
1517 Hampton St.
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Telephone: (803) 779-0100
Facsimile: (803) 256-0702
Email: jfelder@mcgowanhood.com
LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN M. HARVEY
Jonathan Harvey, Fed ID No. 1759
1701 Richland Street
Columbia, South Carolina 29201
Telephone: (803) 779-3363
Facsimile: (803) 779-3364
Email: harveylawfirm@gmail.com
-andCOPILEVITZ & CANTER, LLC
William E. Raney (Pro hac vice)
Kellie Mitchell Bubeck (Pro hac vice)
310 W. 20th Street, Suite 300
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
Telephone: (816) 472-9000
Facsimile: (816) 472-5000
Email: braney@cckc-law.com
kmitchell@cckc-law.com
-andANDERSON + WANCA
Brian J. Wanca (Pro hac vice)
3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500
Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008
Telephone: (847) 368-1500
Facsimile: (847) 368-1501
Email: bwanca@andersonwanca.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Career Counseling,
Inc. d/b/a Snelling Staffing Services
17
Attorneys for Defendants Amsterdam Printing
& Litho, Inc. and Taylor Corporation
September 25, 2018
18
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?