Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC v. 0.944 Acres et al
Filing
98
ORDER AND OPINION granting the requested easements, determining just compensation, and directing the Clerk of Court to disburse the deposited funds to Willie Patterson in the amount of $3,000.00 in addition to any accrued interest. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/13/2018. (asni, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
Dominion Energy Carolina Gas
Transmission, LLC,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
0.944 Acres, in Richland County, South
)
Carolina located on Parcel R39100-02-03; )
WILLIE PATTERSON, JEAN STEWART )
PATTERSON, ERIC PATTERSON,
)
TOYYA YVETTE AZIAN, CACH, LLC,
)
LOVELESS COMMERCIAL
)
CONTRACTING, INC., SOUTH
)
CAROLINA COMMUNITY BANK, AND )
TD BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY
)
MERGER WITH CAROLINA FIRST
)
BANK,
)
)
Defendants.
I.
Civil Action No.: 3:16-cv-01970-JMC
ORDER AND OPINION
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case arises from Dominion Energy Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC’s (“DCGT’s”)
exercise of its eminent domain powers pursuant to the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”), 15 U.S.C. § 717,
et seq. and the applicable Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) Certificate order.
DCGT brought this action under the NGA and Rule 71.1, FRCP, seeking certain easements
(“easements” or “Rights of Way”) it requires in connection with its Eastover pipeline project
(“Project”) over property described as follows (the “Property”):
All that certain piece, parcel or lot of land together with the improvements thereon,
located in the lower township in the County of Richland, State of South Carolina,
containing twenty five (25) acres of land, and being the Eastern half of Fifty (50)
acre tract being described in a plat for D.M. Bynum by J.R. Seay, January 29, 1918,
1
and filed in plat book “C” as page 255 and also being described as Parcel “B” on a
plat prepared for Earnest Patterson and Susan Patterson dated November 14, 1978,
by Claude R. McMillan, Jr., recorded in the Office of the RMC for Richland County
on June 17, 1980.
Said parcel being bounded on the North by land now or formerly of Freeman
whereon it measures Three Hundred Ninety-six (396’) feet; South by land now or
formerly of Bynum whereon it measures Three Hundred Ninety-six (396’) feet;
East by land now or formerly of Bynum heirs whereon it measures Two Thousand
Seven Hundred Seventy-two (2772’) feet, be all measurements a little more or less.
TMS# R39100-02-03.
The court has previously granted partial summary judgment as to DCGT’s right to
condemn the requested easements over the property (ECF No. 54). By way of this Order, the court
hereby grants the requested easements, determines just compensation, and directs the Clerk of
Court to disburse the deposited funds as set forth herein.
II.
ANALYSIS
This matter was tried by the court on February 8, 2018. Sarah Spruill appeared on behalf
of DCGT. None of the Defendants were present. Based on the evidence presented, the court rules
as follows:
I.
Easements
In its Complaint (ECF No. 1), DCGT seeks easement interests in the Property as shown on
Exhibits E and F, which are incorporated by reference herein. DCGT specified that the terms of
the easements shall be as follows:
To the extent Exhibit E shows a Permanent Easement, DCGT seeks an easement or
Right-of-Way to lay, construct, excavate for, maintain, inspect, operate, protect,
repair, renew, remove, or replace a pipeline for the transportation of natural gas,
including any appurtenances (including but not limited to metering facilities,
regulating facilities, valve facilities, fences, gates, concrete pads, cathodic
protection, etc. and any communications facilities incidental thereto) necessary or
desirable for regulatory compliance at any time, together with the right of ingress
and egress to access said easement or Right-of-Way. To the extent Exhibit C shows
2
a Temporary Workspace Area or Additional Temporary Workspace, DCGT seeks
an easement for purposes of the construction of the Project together with the right
of ingress and egress to access said easement. The requested temporary easement
shall terminate upon the completion of the Project or such earlier date as determined
by DCGT.
(ECF No. at ¶ 19.)
DCGT also seeks a Permanent Access Road Non-Exclusive Easement and RightOf-Way in Property-1, for the purpose, at any time and from time to time, of
surveying, clearing, excavating, constructing, maintaining, inspecting, altering,
repairing, replacing and using a permanent roadway for ingress and egress, to
access and service pipeline operations, including the transportation of any and all
equipment necessary or convenient for such operations as shown on Exhibit
F. DCGT shall have the right to cut and remove trees, brush, rocks, and other
obstructions within the access route and to fill depressions or roughly grade the
surface of the access for the purpose of constructing a passable roadway.
(Id. at ¶ 20.)
The property is owned by Willie Patterson (75%), together with Jean Stewart Patterson,
Eric Patterson, and Toyya Yvette Azian (as the heirs of Frank Patterson (25%)). 1 In its Complaint,
DCGT further identified other entities that may have an interest in the subject property (ECF No.
at ¶ 16), of whom TD Bank, N.A. and Loveless Commercial Contracting have appeared. (ECF
Nos. 22, 35).
Based on the evidence presented at the trial of this matter, the Project has been completed
and was put in service on November 10, 2016. Thus, the Temporary Easements will be deemed
terminated at such time as all work required by the FERC Certificate order is completed.
Further, the court grants the requested Permanent Easement as shown on Exhibit E to the
Complaint. Within the shown “50’ Wide DCGT Easement Area,” DCGT and its successors,
1
DCGT has reached a separate settlement with Jean Stewart Patterson, Eric Patterson, and Toyya
Yvette Azian. In addition, it appears that CACH, LLC does not have an interest in this property.
Therefore, these parties are dismissed from this action.
3
affiliates, agents, and assigns shall have the right to lay, construct, excavate for, maintain, inspect,
operate, protect, repair, renew, remove, or replace a pipeline for the transportation of natural gas,
including any appurtenances (including but not limited to metering facilities, regulating facilities,
valve facilities, fences, gates, concrete pads, cathodic protection, etc. and any communications
facilities incidental thereto) necessary or desirable for regulatory compliance at any time, together
with the right of ingress and egress to access said easement or Right-of-Way. No present or future
landowner may interfere with this Permanent Easement, and all present and future landowners
shall be bound by any DCGT Right of Way guidelines.
In addition, the court grants the requested access road as shown on Exhibit F to the
Complaint over which DCGT and its successors, affiliates, agents, and assigns shall have the right
at any time and from time to time, of surveying, clearing, excavating, constructing, maintaining,
inspecting, altering, repairing, replacing and using a permanent roadway for ingress and egress, to
access and service pipeline operations, including the transportation of any and all equipment
necessary or convenient for such operations. Within this area, DCGT and its successors, affiliates,
agents, and assigns shall have the right to cut and remove trees, brush, rocks, and other obstructions
within the access route and to fill depressions or roughly grade the surface of the access for the
purpose of constructing a passable roadway.
This Order or a certified copy thereof may be recorded in the Richland County Register of
Deeds.
B.
Just Compensation
During the trial, DCGT presented the testimony of Carlton Segars. Segars is a certified
real estate appraiser in South Carolina and, based upon the testimony that he gave concerning his
credentials, the court finds that he is an expert in the area of real estate appraisals. Segars testified
4
concerning the appraisal performed regarding the property and the methodology used to determine
the fair market value of the easements in question. As of June 11, 2016, Segars opined that just
compensation for both the permanent and the temporary easements would be One Thousand Five
Hundred Seventy-Five dollars and Seven cents ($1,575.07), which he rounded to One Thousand
Six Hundred dollars ($1,600.00). He further confirmed that his opinion as to value of the
easements remained the same as of August 24, 2016, the date of the court’s Order granting
immediate possession (ECF No. 55). The court finds that this testimony is credible and more than
sufficient to meet DCGT’s burden of proof with respect to determining fair market value.
DCGT has stipulated to a value of Three Thousand dollars ($3,000.00) in order to satisfy
the jurisdictional requirements for this court under the NGA, 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h). (ECF No. 1,
¶7). DCGT deposited this amount with the Clerk of Court on August 29, 2016 (ECF No. 57) as
provided in the court’s Order granting immediate possession (ECF No. 55).
Therefore, the court accepts the stipulated value of Three Thousand dollars ($3,000.00)
and finds that the deposited funds together with any accrued interest will be the just compensation
amount. Accordingly, the court finds that DCGT has satisfied its obligation to provide just
compensation for the easements, including an award of interest.
C.
Allocation
Because DCGT has reached a separate settlement with Jean Stewart Patterson, Eric
Patterson, and Toyya Yvette Azian, and CACH, LLC does not have an interest in this property,
Willie Patterson is the sole owner of the land at issue. During trial, the court was made aware that
Willie Patterson has two judgments against him from T.D. Bank, N.A., and Allied Concrete
Products, LLC. However, any liens against Willie Patterson are not relevant to the court’s
5
consideration of the issues in this matter. Therefore, the court awards the full compensation
amount to Willie Patterson.
III.
CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the court awards Willie Patterson $3,000.00 in addition to any
accrued interest.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
March 13, 2018
Columbia, South Carolina
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?