Stritzinger v. Dobson et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 19 motion to voluntarily dismiss this case, denying Plaintiff's 19 motion to transfer the case, and terminating as moot Plaintiff's 2 12 motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 2/9/2017. (bgoo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION John S. Stritzinger, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Casey Dobson, Partner; William R. ) Stritzinger; James R. Stritzinger, Sr.; Judge ) Valvala, Delaware Superior Court; Vance ) Frank, Mayor of Newark Delaware; Officer ) Curtis Davis; Verizon, Joseph Palmieri; ) Robert S. Callahan; Mr. Reid Whitliff, Former ) U.S. Attorney for the State of Texas, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) C/A No. 3:16-3086-TLW-PJG ORDER This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.), pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. MOTION TO TRANSFER/DISMISS: Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Easter District of North Carolina and consolidated with a case he filed in that court. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff also requests the court dismiss this case in the event the court declines to transfer it. The court finds there is no basis to transfer the case. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this case is granted.1 1 The court notes that nothing in this order extends the applicable statute of limitations for the claims raised in this case. Page 1 of 2 PENDING MOTIONS: In light of this order, Plaintiff’s other pending motions in this case (ECF Nos. 2 & 12) are terminated as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ Paige J. Gossett UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE February 9, 2017 Columbia, South Carolina Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?