Bandara v. Mann et al

Filing 88

ORDER directing the plaintiff to complete three blank subpoena forms and return them to the Clerk of Court within seven (7) days, at which time the Clerk of Court shall issue the subpoenas addressed to the Blue Ribbon Cab Comp any, the Capitol City Cab Company, and the Checker Yellow Cab Company and forward copies of this order and the subpoenas to the United States Marshal for service of process. (Completed subpoena forms due by 8/2/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 7/26/2017. (bgoo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Dr. D.M. Indika Bandara, Plaintiff, v. Dan Mann, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, AAE Director; James A. Compton, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members (Chairman); Carol Fowler, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; F. Xavier Starkes, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, Esq.; William Dukes, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Jerrod F. Howard, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Richard McIntyre, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Dan P. Bell, RichlandLexington Airport District Commission Members; Hazel L. Bennett, RichlandLexington Airport District Commission Members; D.J. Carson, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; David N. Jordan, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; James L. Whitmire, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Duane Cooper, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members; Lynne Douglas, Richland-Lexington Airport District Commission Members, Defendants. _____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No. 3:16-3212-TLW-PJG ORDER Plaintiff Dr. D.M. Indika Bandara, a self-represented prisoner, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the named defendants. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s Page 1 of 3 motions for issuance of subpoenas. (ECF Nos. 79, 80, & 81.) The defendants did not file a response to the motions. The plaintiff previously filed motions that were denied without prejudice to refile to provide the court with additional information required for the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum. The plaintiff timely refiled her motions in compliance with the court’s order. The plaintiff’s motions request records involving the employees of three taxi cab companies, who are not parties to this action. In her current motions, the plaintiff has clearly identified the materials she seeks and from whom she seeks those materials and has provided a reasonable explanation as to how the requested materials are relevant to her case. Additionally, in compliance with the court’s order, she has shown that the requested documents are obtainable only through the identified third party, she has provided the court with completed USM-285 forms so that service can be effected by the United States Marshals Service, and she states that she has the funds necessary to pay for the costs associated with the production of the requested documents. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court provide three blank subpoena forms to the plaintiff for completion. The plaintiff is directed to complete the forms and return them to the Clerk of Court within seven (7) days, at which time the Clerk of Court shall issue the subpoenas addressed to the Blue Ribbon Cab Company, the Capitol City Cab Company, and the Checker Yellow Cab Company and forward copies of this order and the subpoenas to the United States Marshal for service of process. The United States Marshal shall serve the subpoena on the named entities pursuant to 28 Page 2 of 3 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The named entities are directed to provide the items requested to the extent they have documents responsive to plaintiff’s requests in their possession. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ Paige J. Gossett UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE July 26, 2017 Columbia, South Carolina Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?