Echols v. Witherspoon et al
Filing
14
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Sean Alexander Echols,
Plaintiff
v.
Mr. Kenneth Witherspoon, United States Assistant
Attorney; Ms. Stacey Haynes, United States
Assistant Attorney,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
3:16-cv-03228-MGL
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
%, along with
costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O The plaintiff, Sean Alexander Echols, shall take nothing of the defendants, Mr. Kenneth Witherspoon; Ms. Stacey
Haynes and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Date: November 29, 2016
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/M. Walker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
),
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?