Fagnant v. SSC Sumter East Operating Company LLC et al

Filing 14

CONSENT ORDER granting 13 Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 1/4/2017.(asni, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION ROBERT FAGNANT AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LINDA FAGNANT , PLAINTIFF, vs. SSC SUMTER EAST OPERATING COMPANY, LLC D/B/A SUMTER EAST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER, PAUL GRANGER, AND JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, DEFENDANTS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. NO. 3:16-CV-03626-JMC CONSENT ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION This matter is before the Court upon Joint Motion by the Defendants SSC Sumter East Operating Company, LLC and any John and Jane Does 1-10 employed by SSC Sumter East Operating Company, LLC (collectively, the “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Robert Fagnant, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Linda Fagnant (“Plaintiff”) that all claims between these parties be compelled to arbitration. Accordingly, this Court grants the requested relief in the form of this Consent Order and therefore ORDERS as follows: 1. That this case be compelled to arbitration as to the above-referenced parties seeking this relief. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/J. Michelle Childs The Honorable J. Michelle Childs United States District Judge Dated: January 4, 2017 Columbia, South Carolina WE SO CONSENT: YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS, LLP By: s/D. Jay Davis, Jr D. Jay Davis, Jr. Federal I.D. # 6723 Perry M. Buckner, IV Federal I.D. #: 11298 P.O. Box 993, Charleston, SC 29402 (843) 720-5406; jdavis@ycrlaw.com Attorney for the Defendant SSC Sumter East Operating Company, LLC d/b/a Sumter Health & Rehabilitation Center Dated: December 28, 2016 WE SO CONSENT: By:_s/ Bradley H. Banyas D. Nathan Hughey, Federal I.D. # 7635 Bradley H. Banyas, Federal I.D. # 12030 1311 Chuck Dawley Blvd., Suite 201 P.O. Box 348 Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465 (843) 881-8644; nate@hugheylawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: December 28, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?