Doe v. Doctors Care, P.A.
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
James John Todd Kincannon,
Doctors Care, P.A.,
Civil Action No.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
the amount of
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($ ),
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
O other: the plaintiff, James John Todd Kincannon, shall take nothing of the defendant, Doctors Care, P.A., and this
action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b).
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Mary Geiger Lewis, United States District Judge, adopting the Report and Recommendation set forth
by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended the dismissal of this action
Date: May 31, 2017
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?