Ceasar v. SC Department of Health and Environmental Control

Filing 40

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 35 MOTION to Dismiss and 39 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/5/2018. (mwal)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Lisa Michelle Ceasar, C/A. No. 3:17-2018-CMC Plaintiff, v. SC Department of Health and Environmental Control, Order Defendant. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. ECF No. 35. Because Plaintiff is pro se, out of an abundance of caution, the Magistrate Judge entered a Text Order in response to Plaintiff’s motion, informing her that her claims may be subject to additional defenses, such as the statute of limitations, if she proceeds to dismiss her case. ECF No. 36. That Text Order requested Plaintiff advise the court by February 28, 2018, whether she wishes the court to dismiss her case, and also directed Defendant to advise the court whether it consents to dismissal without prejudice. Id. On February 15, Defendant filed a response consenting to dismissal without prejudice. ECF No. 38. On February 27, Plaintiff filed another motion to voluntarily dismiss her case without prejudice, indicating her desire to go forward with dismissal. ECF No. 39. As Plaintiff has twice indicated her desire to dismiss her case without prejudice, and Defendant consents, the court hereby grants Plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 35, 39). Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Cameron McGowan Currie CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE Senior United States District Judge Columbia, South Carolina March 5, 2018 2 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?