Boyd v. Johnson Food Service et al

Filing 66

ORDER granting re 65 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/2/2019. (lbak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Valerie M. Boyd, Plaintiff, vs. Johnson Food Service, LLC; Trinity Foods, Inc. d/b/a Military Food and Beverage; and Preston Wider, III, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 3:17-3414-JMC-SVH ORDER This matter comes before the court on the motion [ECF No. 65] of defendant Trinity Foods, Inc. d/b/a Military Food and Beverage (“MFB”) to compel Valerie M. Boyd (“Plaintiff”) to produce responses to MFB’s First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production (“Discovery Requests”), which are attached to MFB’s motion at ECF Nos. 65-1 and 65-2. The motion indicates that the Discovery Requests were first served on Plaintiff on July 10, 2019. After informal attempts to obtain discovery responses from Plaintiff’s counsel, MFB’s counsel granted Plaintiff’s counsel until September 25, 2019, to provide the discovery responses. [ECF No. 65] MFB’s motion indicates that Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Discovery Requests. Id. 1 In light of the foregoing, the court grants MFB’s motion to compel. Plaintiff is directed to provide responses to the discovery requests by October 16, 2019. Because Plaintiff failed to timely respond to the discovery, any and all objections are deemed waived under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(4). Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the court’s order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to participate in discovery and/or sanctions, including payment of MFB’s attorneys’ fees and costs in preparing such motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 2, 2019 Columbia, South Carolina Shiva V. Hodges United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?