United States of America v. Harbit et al
Filing
62
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff-Relators' as to the second and fourth claims alleging violations of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(C) and (G) and these claims are dismissed with prejudice. (asni, )
3:19-cv-03403-JMC
Date Filed 12/22/21
Entry Number 62
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLUMBIA DIVISION
United States of America,
Plaintiff,
Ex rel. Jeffrey Harbit and Alan Inglett
v.
Plaintiff-Relators,
Consultants in Gastroenterology, P.A.,
South Carolina Endoscopy Center, LLC,
South Carolina Endoscopy Center Northeast,
LLC, S. Gabe Saleeby, M.D., March E.
Seabrook, M.D., John W. Schaberg, M.D.,
Eugene W. Stuart, M.D., Rajeev Vasudeva,
M.D., James A. Richter, M.D., Matthew N.
Thomas, M.D., and Erick Singh, M.D.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
C/A NO. 3:19-03403-JMC
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
■ the Plaintiff-Relators’s take nothing of the defendants as to the second and fourth claims
alleging violations of 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(C) and (G) and these claims are dismissed with
prejudice.
This action was (check one):
■ decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge presiding. The court
having granted in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Date: December 22, 2021
CLERK OF COURT
s/Angie Snipes
_____________________________
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?