Hayes et al v. Berry et al

Filing 19

JUDGMENT. The plaintiffs, Demetric Hayes and Carla Marshall, take nothing of defendants, Joe Earle Berry, Jr., Phillip K. Stephens, Lucas Stephens, Gary Finklea, William H. Edwards, Albert J. Dooley, Jr., Mary M. Caskey, James Y. Becker, Scott D. Wh ittle, Stephens Remodeling, LLC, Haynesworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Law Firm, Finklea Law Firm, Moore Taylor Law Firm, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., South Carolina County of Lexington, and South Carolina County of Lexington Sheriff's Department, and this action is dismissed. (ahil, )

3:20-cv-03039-SAL

Date Filed 11/21/22

Entry Number 19

Page 1 of 1

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina

Demetric Hayes and Carla Marshall
Plaintiffs
v.
Joe Earle Berry, Jr., Phillip K. Stephens, Lucas
Stephens, Gary Finklea, William H. Edwards, Albert
J. Dooley, Jr., Mary M. Caskey, James Y. Becker,
Scott D. Whittle, Stephens Remodeling, LLC,
Haynesworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Law Firm, Finklea
Law Firm, Moore Taylor Law Firm, JP Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., South Carolina County of
Lexington, and South Carolina County of Lexington
Sheriff's Department

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-03039-SAL

Defendants

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)

recover from the defendant (name)

prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

dollars ($

%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of

), which includes

%, along with costs.

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

O the plaintiffs, Demetric Hayes and Carla Marshall, take nothing of defendants, Joe Earle Berry, Jr., Phillip K.
Stephens, Lucas Stephens, Gary Finklea, William H. Edwards, Albert J. Dooley, Jr., Mary M. Caskey, James Y. Becker,
Scott D. Whittle, Stephens Remodeling, LLC, Haynesworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Law Firm, Finklea Law Firm, Moore
Taylor Law Firm, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., South Carolina County of Lexington, and South Carolina County of
Lexington Sheriff's Department, and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. The plaintiffs , recover from the
defendant
the amount of
dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus
postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with costs.
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Court, the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon, United States District Judge, presiding. The Court having
adopted as modified the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Shiva Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge,
which recommended dismissal.
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Date:

November 21, 2022
s/Amanda Douglas Hilley
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk