Jones v. Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated

Filing 25

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report (ECF # 21 ) is ACCEPTED and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF # 12 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 05/06/2022. (dsto, )

Download PDF
3:21-cv-03396-TLW-TER Date Filed 05/06/22 Entry Number 25 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Victoria Lunn Jones, C/A No. 3:21-cv-3396-TLW-TER PLAINTIFF v. Order Sykes Enterprises, Inc., DEFENDANT Plaintiff Victoria Jones, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action asserting claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq. ECF No. 1. The matter now comes before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) filed on March 30, 2022, by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers III, to whom this case was previously assigned. ECF No. 21. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 12, under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Objections to the Report were due April 25, 2022. Defendant did not file any objections to the Report. The Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636. In the absence of objections to the Report, the Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983). The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and filings. For the reasons 3:21-cv-03396-TLW-TER Date Filed 05/06/22 Entry Number 25 Page 2 of 2 stated by the Magistrate Judge, the Report is ACCEPTED and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Terry L. Wooten Terry L. Wooten Senior United States District Judge May 6, 2022 Columbia, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?