Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 42

ORDER granting 40 Motion for Attorney Fees: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), is granted in the amount of $16,547.75. Counsel shall remit any EAJA fees awarded to plaintiff in light of this Order granting attorney fees under 406(b), in the amount of $5,719.80. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 9/15/2011.(gnan )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Veola Williams, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) Michael J. Astrue, ) Commissioner of Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 4:08-1837-TLW ORDER On March 21, 2011, Counsel for the Plaintiff, Veola Williams, filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §406(b). The motion seeks reimbursement for counsel’s representation in the captioned matter in the amount of $16,547.75, which represents twenty-five percent of the past-due benefits withheld by the Social Security Administration for attorney’s fees. The defendant has indicated in his response to plaintiff’s motion that he does not oppose plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees. The Court has reviewed Counsel’s fee petition and the signed fee agreement that was submitted with the petition, and finds Counsel’s request for fees reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §406(b), is granted in the amount of $16,547.75. Counsel shall remit any EAJA fees awarded to plaintiff in light of this Order granting attorney’s fees under 406(b), in the amount of $5,719.80. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Terry L. Wooten TERRY L. WOOTEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE September 15, 2011 Florence, SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?