Hosch v. United Bank Inc et al
Filing
169
ORDER re 159 Order. Defendants, Wade Stephen Melcher, John and Jane Does 1-10, John Doe Corporations 1-10, and Other John Doe Entities 1-10 are hereby DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 04/09/2012. (dsto, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Edward John Hosch,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
United Bank, Inc.; R. Leon Cooper;
)
Douglas B. Ernest; Wade Stephen
)
Melcher; Donald Ward; James R.
)
Quesenberry, Sr.; James R.
)
Quesenberry, Jr.; Triple Q
)
Construction, Inc.; John and Jane
)
Does 1-10; John Doe Corporations 1-10;
)
and Other John Doe Entities 1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
Civil Action No.: 4:09-cv-1490-TLW-TER
ORDER
On June 20, 2011, the plaintiff, Edward John Hosch (“plaintiff”), filed a motion for leave to
file a third amended complaint to drop all but one defendant and to conform and adjust his pleadings
to evidence obtained. (Doc. # 130). In this motion, the plaintiff requested to dismiss, without
prejudice, all named defendants other than United Bank, Inc. (Doc. # 130). On February 13, 2012,
United States Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III entered an Order giving the parties ten days
to file objections to the dismissal of these defendants and stating that an Order would be entered
dismissing these defendants without prejudice if no objections were filed. (Doc. # 159). No
objections have been filed. Therefore, defendants Wade Stephen Melcher, John and Jane Does 1-10,
1
John Doe Corporations 1-10, and Other John Doe Entities 1-10 are hereby DISMISSED from this
action without prejudice.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Terry L. Wooten
TERRY L. WOOTEN
United States District Judge
April 9, 2012
Florence, South Carolina
1
Defendants R. Leon Cooper, Douglas B. Ernest, Donald Ward, James R. Quesenberry, Sr.,
James R. Quesenberry, Jr., and Triple Q Construction were all previously dismissed from this action.
(Docs. 22, 72).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?