Diggs v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for attorneys fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §406(b), is granted in the amount of $15,698.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 2/28/2012.(gnan )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION RICHARD R. DIGGS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant, ) _______________________________) Civil Action No: 4:09-CV-3257-TER ORDER On November 7, 2011, Counsel for the Plaintiff, Harry F. Smithson, filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §406(b). The motion seeks reimbursement for counsel’s representation in the captioned matter in the amount of $15,698.00, which amounts to twenty-five percent of the past-due benefits withheld by the Social Security Administration for attorney’s fees. The Defendant has indicated in his response to Plaintiff’s motion that he does not oppose Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and “agrees that an award of attorney fees in the amount of $15,698.00 (representing 29.5 hours of work before this Court) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b) is reasonable in light of the fee agreement between Plaintiff and her attorney and the services provided by her attorney in this action.” (Doc. #21). The Court has reviewed Counsel’s fee petition and the signed fee agreement that was submitted with the petition, and finds Counsel’s request for fees reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §406(b), is granted in the amount of $15,698.00. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas E. Rogers, III Thomas E. Rogers, III United Stated Magistrate Judge February 28, 2012 Florence, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?