Singley v. Bush et al

Filing 18

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judges Report is ACCEPTED 14 . For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, the complaint in this case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 05/20/2011. (dsto, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Ferris Gieger Singley, Jr., # 211565,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Perry CI Major Dennis Bush;
)
SCDC Director Jon Ozmint; and
)
SC Department of Corrections,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

Civil Action No.: 4:10-cv-660-TLW-TER

ORDER
On March 18, 2010, the plaintiff, Ferris Gieger Singley, Jr. (“plaintiff”), proceeding pro se,
filed this civil action. (Doc. #1). The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Thomas
E. Rogers, III pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2),
DSC.
This matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (“the
Report”) filed by the Magistrate Judge to whom this case had previously been assigned. (Doc. # 14).
On September 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge
recommends that the complaint in this case be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and
service of process. (Doc. # 14). The plaintiff filed no objections to the Report. Objections were due
on September 20, 2010.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept,

1

reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. §
636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this
Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v.
Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. It
is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 14). For the
reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, the complaint in this case is DISMISSED without
prejudice and without issuance and service of process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Terry L. Wooten
United States District Judge
May 20, 2011
Florence, South Carolina

2