Harrison v. United States Attorney General et al

Filing 15

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This court finds the Magistrate Judges recommendation fairly and accurately summarizes the facts and applies the correct principles of law and it is incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 03/24/2011. (dsto, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Patrick R. Harrison, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) United States Attorney General; Homeland ) Security; Immigration and Customs ) Enforcement, ICE" South Carolina Attorney ) General; Richland County Solicitor; ) Richland County Public Defender; and Alvin ) S. Glenn Detention Center, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) C/A No. 4:11-21-JFA-TER ORDER The pro se plaintiff, Patrick R. Harrison, is a pretrial detainee at the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center. He brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking release from custody and raising issues pertaining to the conditions of his confinement. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this action 1 has prepared a thorough Report and Recommendation and opines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and should be dismissed. The Report sets forth in detail the relevant facts and standards of law on this matter, and the court incorporates such without a recitation. The plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report and The Magistrate Judge's review is made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Civil Rule 73.02. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 Recommendation, which was entered on the docket on February 24, 2011. However, the plaintiff failed to file objections and the deadline within which to do so has expired.2 In the absence of specific objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). As the Magistrate Judge correctly opines, the plaintiff's request to have his 1994 and 2006 deportations as an illegal alien declared invalid is not reviewable by this court. Aguiar ex rel. Wargo v. Mukasey, 547 F.Supp. 2d (D. Conn. 2008) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(9)). Plaintiff's challenge to his 2010 detainment for pending state criminal charges is also outside of this court's purview as federal courts are not authorized to interfere with a State's pending criminal proceedings. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Finally, plaintiff's challenges to his prisoner classification and denial of parole while incarcerated in Virginia are moot because he is no longer in the custody of the State of Virginia. After carefully reviewing the applicable laws, the record in this case, and the Report and Recommendation, this court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation fairly and accurately summarizes the facts and applies the correct principles of law and it is incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. On March 3, 2011, the copy of the Report mailed to the plaintiff was returned to the Clerk by the United States Postmaster marked "Undeliverable." The plaintiff had previously been advised that he must keep the court apprised of his address changes or face possible dismissal of his action. 2 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. March 24, 2011 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?