Thomasson v. Tapper et al
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further review of plaintiffs objections to the Report and Recommendation 61 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion to Appoint Counsel 63 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 10/31/2011. (dsto, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Sylvester J. Thomasson,
Joan Tapper, P.A.; Dr. Lorenzo Guevara,
Civil Action No. 4:11-0686 DCN TER
This matter is before this court pursuant to plaintiff’s Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation which was filed on October 11, 2011. In the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation, he recommends dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for failure to
On October 18, 2011, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, and on October 20,
2011, plaintiff filed his objections to the Report and Recommendation.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Magistrate Judge for
further review of plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
David C. Norton
Chief United States District Judge
October 31, 2011
Charleston, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?